So what provoked this writing? Today I was reading a book by Mark Tully, 'India's Unending Journey - Finding balance in a time of change'. It is an interesting read as is with other writings of Mark Tully. Another reason why I enjoy Mark Tully's works is his pro-Indian views. Which I admire a lot. Coming back to point. In this book author is discussing about the contrasts that you see in India, Indian Culture and religions. At one point he quotes Bede Griffiths' words from "The Marriage of East and West" ..
"The East must learn the use of reason, in science, in politics, in industry and I would say above all in moral life..... But the west has to recover its lost imagination..."
Which is very interesting thought. He the goes on to say that Bede Griffiths regards myth as "symbolic expression of reality in terms of human imagination". That is a beautifully chosen definition. Myth is a 'Reality' which is presented symbolically using imagination. So while exact words may not be true but the underlying concept or source behind a mythology is true. While "the 'Ram Setu' was built by Nal-Neel using floating stones" might be imaginative but Setu itself is true. So with that definition, can it be said that mythology is history written in a imaginative way?
Other views may differ, but I really liked this way of looking at mythology. May be it is just my bias towards mythology as I always believed that mythology is true.
1 comment:
In my opinion mythology is tale which is believed by common public without asking for any proof and the other important aspect is lack of date/time reference of the events.
When you have proof and date/time of events, it becomes history.
And when the tale is not believed by common public, it becomes story.
Now why Ramayan is mythology, when we have Dasahara and Diwali as the date/time reference. The point again is that this date/time reference is again the belief.
OR
Mythology is the history, which is way back in time, when there was no "Historian" to name it as history and thus mythology got saved from getting proved.
And later historians try to prove / disprove the tale in to order to make/ not to make it as a part of history.
Post a Comment